Flaws with new guidance for Precedent H
Latest news on new RTA portal fees and timing of extension of portal for employers’ and public liability cases over on Litigation Futures. I’m getting Jackson indigestion.
Excellent analysis from Costs Lawyer Matthew Harman on flaws with new guidance for Precedent H.
Also, why does Precedent H clearly state:
“This estimate excludes VAT (if applicable), court fees, success fees and ATE insurance premiums (if applicable), costs of detailed assessment, costs of any appeals, costs of enforcing any judgment and [complete as appropriate]”
but then have on the next four pages a row for “Court fees”?