To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
1 thought on “Listing fee payable once only”
“This may not stop certain courts from asking for the fee twice but, if a claimant is silly enough to pay again, that is no reason to recover two sets of fees on assessment”
Interesting point, Simon
what is your advice then, to solicitors in cases where the court has transferred the matter to another venue for trail, and the new court demand further listing fees, and will not list it without payment? Or how about the provisions in CPR for a claim being struck out for non-payment of the fees when requested?
Or how about where both solicitor and draftsmen write to the court asking for the refund of the second fee ( I agree, by the way, the court should not be asking for it at all), and the court say No?
Whilst you are clearly blase about what you think your defendant clients should be paying for, I recommend a healthy dose of reality to your thinking on occaision might assist