To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
3 thoughts on “RTA Portal claims case summaries”
very one sided article
Im surprised this is publicised on the blog as useful case summaries – will we now all be submitting every DJ decision and taking it as Gospel?
I think its called advertising
I’m happy to send anyone a copy of the judgment in Patel v Fortis from HHJ Morgan on the subject of cases coming out of the MOJ Portal. Please just drop me an email to email @ sarahrobsonbarrister.co.uk (without the spaces).