To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
1 thought on “Retrospective success fees”
Almost all Claimant Solicitors offer a free initial consultation to ‘potential clients’ and without fail (perhaps a few exceptions) they always appear in the bill passed off as being covered by a retrospective CFA or a Terms of Business Agreement.
I have been pulling Claimant’s Solicitors up on this anomaly for years and copying and pasting their own website submissions in Points of Dispute. Invaribly the Claimant gets away with it at Court.
I would have thought further support could be draw these days from paragraphs 108-110 in Motto.
If a country-wide investigation was undertaken by the Advertising Standards Agency I believe they would probably unearth a scam doing back years costing insurers and government millions in having to pay for these ‘free’ initial interviews.