To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
14 thoughts on “Blow to novel charging arrangement”
Imagine if it had been a between the parties case. How would he have claimed his fee from the other side? Indemnity principle, and all that. LOL.
@ Richard
that would have made for a most entertaining DA hearing hahaha
More to the point how would the cd’s fee have been paid and what’s the difference between a grade 3 and grade 4 fee.
I’m just waiting for the usual “greedy Claimant Lawyer” comment arising from him charging 3 times the original quote haha !
Interesting how they don’t say what the “complications” were 😉
I wonder how she proved that she “discharged” her liability?
I wonder who has the dirtiest mind – Costs Draftsman/Costs Lawyer?? Though clearly the comments here are very relevant to the circumstances of the case and may well be reasonable and proportionate!
How would one set about drafting the actual bill of costs for this? Does 1 unit of time claimed equate to 6 minutes of oral sex?
Surely this was a case of premature issue
I assume this matter went to an oral hearing.
Inflated fees. Tough one to swallow.
Took the phrase ‘come to some sort of arrangement too literally.’
bet she didnt see that coming
A shot in the eye for access to justice
This should have remained confidential, considering she had signed a gagging order.