To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
6 thoughts on “Cap for provisional assessment costs”
why did he even need to comment?
either the level of work undertaken is reasonable or it isn’t
The value of the bill is immaterial
This is an incredible revelation for all!!
Keep up the good work.
Proportionality is the buzz word
The last 3 blogs “headline posts” from the CLowns Conf, prove 2 things;-
1. CLowns are now so vainglorious, whenever anything is said they squawk “its news! its news! we said it so its news!”
2. The everlasting consistency of inconsistency, remains alive and well post-Jackson, and will provide revenue streams ad infinitum for those smart enough to follow them, and not too busy squawking about non-news
This confirms my view that the ACL weekend is a waste of time – the only reason to go would be load up on CPD points. Thinking of not renewing next year.
Like so many other Clowns on here, if Simon says something on his blog then it obviously correct and we must then copy and paste what he tells us in to the points of dispute! So many ‘big’ defendant solicitors follow like sheep!