To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
6 thoughts on “Fellow of the Association of Costs Lawyers”
clearly cut and paste from old
However, also somewhat odd. The attack is a time attack. Therefore the time should have come down with the umpteen years experience….
If it was a rate challenge may hold more weight ….
Costs Lawyers are Fellows of the Association of Costs Lawyers (FALCD).
Otherwise known as the Fake Alias for Law Costs Draftsman!
I agree. The time should have come down then. Beating his chest about being a member or fellow of this crowd. If ever there was a point that shot itself in the foot that was it! Made my day
You should issue an Application to –
1. Ensure every single item claimed in the Bill of Costs is held to strict proof in light of this lucid error
2. Reduce the entire Bill by 10% to account for this inexcusable misconduct.
3. Ensure your blog remains free of time invested of personal snipes.
Petty.
(My name isn’t petty)
I would ask the drafter for proof of ACL membership (a photograph of them wearing the old ALCD tie will suffice) otherwise I would invite the Judge to strike the bill out!
I read a transcript yesterday, from the SCCO, describing someone as a CLown, when in fact they weren’t Associated
Whilst I agree that’s a terrible sleight to bear, it shows even the SCCO don’t really care for titles