Legal Cost Specialists

detailed assessment

Can one judge make a costs order and a different judge undertake the summary assessment?

The case of Isah, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWCA Civ 268 concerned: “the issue of whether a judge is permitted to order costs to be summarily assessed in a different court by a different judge or whether a summary assessment must be undertaken by the …

Can one judge make a costs order and a different judge undertake the summary assessment? Read More »

Qualified One-Way Costs Shifting (QOCS) and detailed assessment

A recent post looked at the arguments for and against whether Qualified One-Way Costs Shifting (“QOCS”) applies to detailed assessment proceedings.  The recent decision of Costs Judge Leonard in PME v The Scout Association [2023] EWHC 158 (SCCO) is therefore interesting. The underlying case concerned a claim for personal injury.  The claim settled in the …

Qualified One-Way Costs Shifting (QOCS) and detailed assessment Read More »

Does QOCS protection apply to detailed assessment?

Last week I attended the Association of Costs Lawyers’ London Regional Meeting.  This consisted of a couple of interesting costs talks from some of the costs specialists at 12 King’s Bench Walk. One of these considered the question of whether QOCS protection applies to detailed assessment.  12KBW have kindly given me permission to reproduce the …

Does QOCS protection apply to detailed assessment? Read More »

New terminology for costs judges

The Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals have announced changes to how certain Judges are addressed in court. From now on, the Judges listed below should be addressed in court or tribunal hearings as ‘Judge’: Masters Upper Tribunal Judges Judges of the Employment Appeal Tribunal District Judges District Judges (Magistrates Courts) First-Tier Tribunal …

New terminology for costs judges Read More »

Good reason to set aside Default Costs Certificate

Practice Directions do not have the same status as the Civil Procedure Rules themselves. Sometimes the Practice Directions are misleading. Sometimes they are simply wrong (eg KU (A Child) v LCC [2005] EWCA Civ 475). One example of the Practice Directions being misleading/wrong is in relation to the issue of setting aside a Default Costs …

Good reason to set aside Default Costs Certificate Read More »

Recovering shortfall in costs from client’s damages

During the rough-and-tumble of a typical detailed assessment hearing, where the judge will be making multiple ex tempore decisions, it is routine to hear criticisms of the amount of time claimed by the receiving party and/or criticisms of certain items that have been included within a bill of costs. It is much less usual to …

Recovering shortfall in costs from client’s damages Read More »

Scroll to Top